As I come to the end of my Superintendent certification program, I have been asked to reflect upon recommendations and lessons learned through my internship activities. What follows is a summary of those recommendations.
Sunday, April 28, 2013
Sunday, April 21, 2013
Job Entry Plan
Dr. Creel spoke last Thursday on the importance of having a job entry plan. While mine is fairly rudimentary, I hope to improve it over time. Having a strong, effective job entry plan can make your transition into a new (or out of an old) role much smoother. I believe him 100%. It makes perfect sense.
Anyway, enjoy...
Anyway, enjoy...
Comprehensive Competency Reflection
Below are the results of my competency reflection. While it took awhile to write, this certainly shows how busy the last 8 months have been. Please feel free to reply with your thoughts and suggestions.
Sunday, April 14, 2013
Position & Leadership Goals
Position and Leadership Goal
As I navigate through
my career, my career goals have progressed.
Initially, my goal had been to serve as a high school principal or
possibly a Superintendent or Assistant Superintendent. I have discovered, though, that I have a
strong affinity toward Academia. I can
now say that my long-term career goals include ultimately serving as a member
of doctoral faculty in Educational Leadership.
Competency Review - End of Program
As I compared my previous
responses from September to my current responses in April to the superintendent
competencies, I was pleased to see that I had improved
significantly. The large majority of my
responses were considered strengths.
Specifically, Competencies 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, and 10 all were areas in which
I scored myself to be all strengths.
Most of the remaining
competencies were scored mostly strengths, with a few competent and very few needs
improvement. Competency 8 is the
only competency area in which there remains significant work to be done.
Within Competency 8, the
primary driver (for improvement) seems to be a lack of “on the job” type of
experience. To date in my career, I
still have very limited experiences in working directly with Board members,
working with the budget (on the district level), and most of the other
“district level” activities within the competency.
Overall, I am very pleased
with my progress since September. I have
gained greater insight into the role of the superintendent and have more
confidence in my abilities to function in a leadership role at the district
level.
The following is a summary of my
findings:
Sunday, December 16, 2012
Annual Financial Audit
The Deputy Superintendent for Finance was not
physically able to meet me for an interview.
I submitted the questions via email.
The responses below are as received.
How is the
external auditor selected?
The District employs a full time Internal Auditor,
whose reporting responsibility is directly to the Board of Trustees.
The
District maintains budgetary controls to ensure compliance with legal
provisions embodied in the annual appropriated (official) budget as adopted by
the Board of Trustees. Activities in the General Fund, Child Nutrition Special
Revenue Fund, and Debt Service Fund are included in the official budget. The
level of budgetary control (i.e., the level at which expenditures cannot
legally exceed the appropriated amount) is at the fund-function level as
required by the Texas Education Agency. In addition, lower level organizational
units' expenditures are controlled through the District's automated financial
computer systems at varying combinations of the account code structure. The
system also provides controls limiting accessibility to budgetary account
codes. Oversight control of all District expenditures is maintained by the
Financial Services staff.
Understanding Teachers' Salaries
We monitor
other districts’ salary schedules regularly and make necessary modifications to
our salary schedules to remain competitive.
Based on the State budget deficit and funding reductions for public
education over the 2011 biennium, an early recommendation in our budget review
process last year involved freezing salaries in an effort to preserve as many
jobs as possible.
The 2011-12
budget froze salaries and the original plan for 2012-13 was to do the
same. Freezing salaries meant that we
had to lower our beginning teacher starting salary and reduce our hire in
schedule to avoid a situation where a new teacher would have a salary greater
than an existing teacher with the same or greater years of experience (assuming
appropriate performance evaluations).
The thought was that this strategy best supported the district’s
mission, values, focus, and goals given the difficult financial
circumstances.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)