My supervisor is a Deputy Superintendent within a relatively large district. I took great pride in her interest in my progress toward achieving my stated goals, despite her busy schedule. At our SISE conference, she commented positively on my progress and we reflected on areas in which more improvement is needed. We did agree that, regardless of education, until you accept a role as an Asst. Superintendent, Deputy Superintendent, or Superintendent, you really do not know where deficiencies will show.
Saturday, May 11, 2013
Updated Vita
Since September, 2012, there have been a few significant changes to my vita:
- I have been able to update my Educational
section to include the Superintendency Preparation Coursework.
- I have updated my Presentations section to include
presentations to the Southwest Educational Research Association (SERA).
- I have updated the Publications section to include an
upcoming manuscript that will be published in the Texas Study of Secondary
Education (TASSP) in the Spring, 2013 issue.
- I have updated my Professional Affiliations section to include my
service to the SERA Board of directors for SERA 2014.
I have attached the updated vita below:
Three-Year Professional Development Plan
As I reflect upon my three year professional development plan, I have no qualms in declaring it probably the most difficult assignment within this capstone course. Other assignments were mere reflections and descriptions of our coursework and internship activities to-date. The three-year PD plan required that I not only assess my weaknesses, but to project forward based upon my perceived needs.
The reason I found it to be so difficult lies in the vast enormity of my deficits. I have so many needs. I hope that as time progresses that I will gain the confidence to better define my needs.
I copy of my PD plan is posted below.
The reason I found it to be so difficult lies in the vast enormity of my deficits. I have so many needs. I hope that as time progresses that I will gain the confidence to better define my needs.
I copy of my PD plan is posted below.
Sunday, May 5, 2013
Reflective Practice
According
to Norman Vincent Peale, "One of the greatest moments in anybody's
developing experience is when he no longer tries to hide from himself but
determines to get acquainted with himself as he really is." Reflection is necessary for growth in any area
of life. Through reflection, we are able
to gauge where we are, in comparison to where we want to be. This is applicable in education. While being aware of what one should be
knowledgeable of at a certain point, through reflection, one can determine what
it will take to attain the desired result.
The crucial piece of this process is the action that is taken post
deliberation. Throughout the process of
pursuing my certification, I have learned many things about myself as a leader
and about the positions I seek to hold. Much
of this I have learned by pondering on different experiences I've had as a
teacher, teacher leader, and as an administrator. I have been able to identify my strengths, as
well as areas of need through reflective writing and self-assessments.
Sunday, April 28, 2013
Recommendations & Lessons Learned
As I come to the end of my Superintendent certification program, I have been asked to reflect upon recommendations and lessons learned through my internship activities. What follows is a summary of those recommendations.
Sunday, April 21, 2013
Job Entry Plan
Dr. Creel spoke last Thursday on the importance of having a job entry plan. While mine is fairly rudimentary, I hope to improve it over time. Having a strong, effective job entry plan can make your transition into a new (or out of an old) role much smoother. I believe him 100%. It makes perfect sense.
Anyway, enjoy...
Anyway, enjoy...
Comprehensive Competency Reflection
Below are the results of my competency reflection. While it took awhile to write, this certainly shows how busy the last 8 months have been. Please feel free to reply with your thoughts and suggestions.
Sunday, April 14, 2013
Position & Leadership Goals
Position and Leadership Goal
As I navigate through
my career, my career goals have progressed.
Initially, my goal had been to serve as a high school principal or
possibly a Superintendent or Assistant Superintendent. I have discovered, though, that I have a
strong affinity toward Academia. I can
now say that my long-term career goals include ultimately serving as a member
of doctoral faculty in Educational Leadership.
Competency Review - End of Program
As I compared my previous
responses from September to my current responses in April to the superintendent
competencies, I was pleased to see that I had improved
significantly. The large majority of my
responses were considered strengths.
Specifically, Competencies 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, and 10 all were areas in which
I scored myself to be all strengths.
Most of the remaining
competencies were scored mostly strengths, with a few competent and very few needs
improvement. Competency 8 is the
only competency area in which there remains significant work to be done.
Within Competency 8, the
primary driver (for improvement) seems to be a lack of “on the job” type of
experience. To date in my career, I
still have very limited experiences in working directly with Board members,
working with the budget (on the district level), and most of the other
“district level” activities within the competency.
Overall, I am very pleased
with my progress since September. I have
gained greater insight into the role of the superintendent and have more
confidence in my abilities to function in a leadership role at the district
level.
The following is a summary of my
findings:
Sunday, December 16, 2012
Annual Financial Audit
The Deputy Superintendent for Finance was not
physically able to meet me for an interview.
I submitted the questions via email.
The responses below are as received.
How is the
external auditor selected?
The District employs a full time Internal Auditor,
whose reporting responsibility is directly to the Board of Trustees.
The
District maintains budgetary controls to ensure compliance with legal
provisions embodied in the annual appropriated (official) budget as adopted by
the Board of Trustees. Activities in the General Fund, Child Nutrition Special
Revenue Fund, and Debt Service Fund are included in the official budget. The
level of budgetary control (i.e., the level at which expenditures cannot
legally exceed the appropriated amount) is at the fund-function level as
required by the Texas Education Agency. In addition, lower level organizational
units' expenditures are controlled through the District's automated financial
computer systems at varying combinations of the account code structure. The
system also provides controls limiting accessibility to budgetary account
codes. Oversight control of all District expenditures is maintained by the
Financial Services staff.
Understanding Teachers' Salaries
We monitor
other districts’ salary schedules regularly and make necessary modifications to
our salary schedules to remain competitive.
Based on the State budget deficit and funding reductions for public
education over the 2011 biennium, an early recommendation in our budget review
process last year involved freezing salaries in an effort to preserve as many
jobs as possible.
The 2011-12
budget froze salaries and the original plan for 2012-13 was to do the
same. Freezing salaries meant that we
had to lower our beginning teacher starting salary and reduce our hire in
schedule to avoid a situation where a new teacher would have a salary greater
than an existing teacher with the same or greater years of experience (assuming
appropriate performance evaluations).
The thought was that this strategy best supported the district’s
mission, values, focus, and goals given the difficult financial
circumstances.
Reflections on Differentiated Staffing
Our group came
up with a model in which certified (highly-qualified) personnel would lead a
group of lesser qualified "educators" in scaffolded vertical
teams. It would allow for a career
ladder for those that wished to serve at higher levels as well as financial
flexibility at the lower levels of each team.
I, personally,
dissent in this conversation. To
implement differentiated staffing in this model de-values certified teachers as
educators and farms out tasks to uncertified "educators" such as
aids, student teachers, and interns. I
feel that to do so robs students of quality in the classroom.
It is a
solution that only serves to decrease instructional costs and that is
unacceptable. In the spirit of the guiding question listed in the instructions
above, I cannot write a single line, let alone 1-2 pages on “How differentiated
staffing might impact and/or improve the goals of that campus.”
Economies of Scale Comparison
The analysis of the economies of scale for the two Sample ISDs is shown below:
Indicator
|
Small District
|
Large District
|
| Total Revenues |
$ 8,823,250
|
$ 329,638,930
|
| Revenues per Student |
$ 10,529
|
$ 10,316
|
| Total Operational Expenditures |
$ 7,216,335
|
$ 284,664,004
|
| Expenditures per Student |
$ 8,611
|
$ 8,908
|
| Average Teacher Salary |
$ 39,771
|
$ 50,307
|
| Total Students |
830
|
32,326
|
Saturday, December 15, 2012
FIRST Accountability System - Top Three Indicators
FIRST
is a financial accountability system for Texas school districts developed by
the Texas Education Agency in response to Senate Bill 875 of the 76th Legislature
in 1999. The primary goal of FIRST is to
achieve quality performance in the management of school districts’ financial
resources, a goal made more significant due to the complexity of accounting
associated with Texas’ school finance system.
The FIRST rating shows that schools are
accountable not only for student learning, but also for achieving these results
cost-effectively and efficiently.
The FIRST rating system assigns one of
four financial accountability ratings to Texas school districts based on 22 indicators
–
- the highest being “Superior Achievement”, followed by
- “Above-Standard Achievement”,
- “Standard Achievement”, and
- “Substandard Achievement”.
Sunday, December 9, 2012
Analysis of the Effects of Target Revenue on Two Texas ISDs
When taking an initial look at the two districts, I immediately noticed that there was a similarity in size. Unfortunately, that is where the similarities end. Looking at the chart below, one is able to determine that there is a distinct difference between the two student populations.
District 1
|
District 2
| |
Total Students
|
3,903
|
3,890
|
% Econ Disadvantaged
|
93.3
|
20.7
|
% LEP
|
48
|
2
|
% SPED
|
9
|
2
|
% CATE
|
24
|
14
|
Upon further review, it was noticed that District 1, by all appearances, has a student population that will be much more resource consumptive to educate.
Sunday, December 2, 2012
Additional Stakeholder Input in the Budgeting Process
I had the opportunity to visit with the Assistant Superintendent for Finance of my district. He spoke very strongly as to the need for a strong support structure within the district for successful budget development. The idea of clear communications became central to our discussion, just as it did during my conversations with the Superintendent.
I asked him about the contributions each of the following individuals or groups could provide toward the budget process. I have summarized his responses below.
Understanding TEA Budgeting Guidelines
In our previous exercise we discussed and determined
and five important dates that districts observe during the budgeting process. I spend a significant amount of time
outlining the specific, state-mandated events, while some stressed their own
internal, district-mandated events. The
assignment did not specify, thus allowing for both approaches. During the activity, I utilized the TEA
Budgeting Guidelines as well as the Texas Education Code (TEC) to formulate my
answers.
- The activity will help me in my future as a District Administrator in that I became aware of the legal requirements for public school budgets in Texas. Specific requirements and definitions include:
- The superintendent is the budget officer for the district and is responsible for Preparing and submitting to the Board a proposed budget as well as administering the budget;
- The district budget must be approved by a date set by the state board of education, currently August 31 (June 30 if the district uses a July 1 FY start date). Likewise, the district budget must be prepared by August 20 (June 19 if the district uses a July 1 fiscal year start date);
- The Board of trustees must call a public meeting of the board of trustees, no fewer than 10 days and no more than 30 days prior to its approval. Any taxpayer in the district may be present and participate in the meeting; and
- Each district must file its budget with by the date prescribed in the annual system guidelines and set by the State Board of Education (SBOE).
Budget Development Deadlines
When making an attempt to determine the “list of
events and important dates” that are utilized to develop a district budget seem
to be split along two different lines.
Those two lines are:
1. State-mandated
dates; and
2. Locally
determined (soft) dates.
To address the state-mandated dates there are three
that most groups identify. They include:
1. The
budget must be prepared by 8/20 (6/19 for districts that observe a 7/1 FY
start);
2. The
budget must be approved by 8/30 (6/30 for districts that observe a 7/1 FY
start); and
3. The
annual budget adoption (public budget meeting) must be announced no more than
30 days, but no less than 10 days prior to the meeting.
The above mentioned dates are set within the Texas
Education Code (TEC). Two additional
dates that are state-mandated, but receive much less attention are:
1. The
district budget must be filed with the State of Texas by a date set by the
State Board of Education (SBOE). That
date may change and is not written within the TEC as the previously mentioned
events; and
2. The
chief Appraiser shall prepare and certify an estimate of the taxable value of
district property by April 30th of each year if requested by the
District (see note below):
- The purpose is to determine values of property in that taxing unit for the taxing unit's budgetary purposes. This provision does not apply if the District notifies the chief appraiser that District elects not to receive the estimate or assistance as described by statute.
In addition to state-mandated deadlines, each
district also sets internal deadlines. Deadlines for actions such as:
1.
Projection
of anticipated enrollment / revenue projections which often occurs in January;
2.
Budget
workshops / campus-based budget requests that occur during the Feb – March time
period; and
3.
Board of
Trustees budget retreats / preparation sessions to discuss budget allocations
and preparations prior to finalizing the budget. Sessions often occur between April and June.
Of course, internal
dates are relative to the Fiscal Year under which a district operates. The dates above are for districts with a
September 1 Fiscal Year. If a district
were to operate on a July 1 Fiscal Year, I would anticipate those district
deadlines would shift by 2-3 months.
Superintendent’s Roles and Responsibilities in the Budgeting Process
As I spoke to my Superintendent, a recurring theme resounded with me. At each turn, she mentioned communication. The role of the Superintendent in the budget process is officially defined as, “Preparing and submitting to the Board a proposed budget and administering the budget,” per our District Board Policy. The steps that must be taken in order to complete the task are many, and communication is at the center or the process.
The Goal-driven Budget
A goal-driven budget is a budget in which the
allocation of resources within the district is made in an equitable manner that
serves as a reflection of the districts Vision.
The allocation and distribution of funds is made in an effort to improve
programs, services, and results. Each
district in Texas creates a district improvement plan (DIP) that outlines the
plans and goals for the district. Each
school within the district will also create a campus improvement plan (CIP)
that states the goals, actions, and resources necessary to meet the goals of
the campus. In each case, the goals,
actions, and resource allocation within the district should mirror the Vision
of the Board of Trustees. When all
resource allocation is made with the Vision of the Board in mind, then a
goal-driven budget has been made.
In my district, a failure to meet AYP led our Board
of Trustees to refocus our district’s Vision.
In doing so, the decision was made to allocate additional Federal funds
toward the creation of a PLC model within our district. Additionally, within the PLC model, the decision
was made to focus on project-based learning (PBL) and differentiated instruction
(DI) models of learning. The
determination to address the needs of our students through DI and PBL reflected
the Board’s Vision which includes, “Where all students learn, grow and succeed.”
In order to implement the new programs, significant
resources had to be allocated. To improve
our attendance (for WADA), new programs were purchased to improve
accountability for schools and parents to enhance our daily attendance-taking
procedures. The new programs required a
significant investment in training, materials, and time. Expenses for training included travel, books,
speakers’ fees, substitute staff, and staff development services fees (for
outside PD). All of those expenses were
allocated based upon a very detailed plan that was created by a district
leadership committee and submitted through the Superintendent to the board of
Trustees.
All of our
purpose-driven budgeting was made with a communication and feedback loop
through our Board of Trustees and DIP committee (which includes community
stakeholders) so that all district stakeholders had the opportunity to know
that these systems and allocations were made with the district Vision in mind.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)